For those following a recognised training course. Students are entitled to all the benefits of membership, have full voting rights and can take part in all the Institute's activities at privileged rates.Apply Here
For anyone with an interest in medical illustration and who supports the objects of the Institute as set forth in the Memorandum of Association.Apply Here
For those engaged in medical illustration and who hold a professional qualification approved by Council. Professional Members are entitled to use the letters MIMI after their name.Apply Here
For companies who wish to support the aims and activities of the Institute and the profession, or whose business activities include the supply of equipment, materials and services to the profession.Apply Here
Fellowship of the Institute recognises excellent abilities and skills and is its highest distinction of the Institute. Applications may be made by Members of the Institute with a minimum of 5 years’ post-qualification experience.Apply Here
Updated:10 November 2011
Regularly we see the “Female Photographer” advert appear stating that this is acceptable under the Sex Discrimination Act as a genuine occupational qualification. Is this actually true?
How many posts where female only vacancies have been filled actually only undertake photography of women? Why do we then not see “male photographer only adverts?"
I expect the common argument that women should be given a choice of male or female photographer is spouted out.
Why then do men not get given the same courtesy?
Surely if a female photographer in a female only post undertakes photography of men as well then this forfeits the exemption under the Sex Discrimination act!
Seldom do I see the same being applied to other specialities in healthcare, for example Urology where it is common for female nurses to be running erectile dysfunction clinics!
The same applies to chaperones we seem to be the only healthcare profession obsessed with insisting on chaperones for a male photographer photographing female patients.
A quick survey I did from a few departments clearly shows female photographers rarely offer or have a chaperone for male patients or are required to by their employers.
As the Equality and Human rights Commission state on their website “Example. A hospital insists that a male nurse has a chaperone when seeing patients. If a female nurse is not required to have a chaperone, this may be direct sex discrimination”.
I suggest as a profession we do not abide by the Equality Act 2010 and in fact regularly discriminate when advertising “female only” photographers and insisting only male photographers have chaperones.
Posted for discussion by an IMI Member